Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 15 de 15
2.
Eur J Dermatol ; 32(6): 731-735, 2022 11 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36856392

Background: "Convive con el Sol" (Living with the sun) is an educational programme to promote education about sun exposure and healthy photoprotection habits among Spanish children. Objectives: This study evaluated the effects of the "Convive con el Sol" school-based sun protection programme on the sun safety habits, attitudes, knowledge, and practices in preschool and first-year primary school students. Materials & Methods: A quasi-experimental pilot study was established with a pre-test/post-test design and without a control group to evaluate the efficacy of the "Convive con el Sol" programme in children aged 3-8 years. Two questionnaires were used to evaluate the programme: the CHRESI questionnaire and the SolSano questionnaire. Results: Seven educational centres participated in the study. The number of completed baseline questionnaires was 351 for the CHRESI survey and 226 for the SolSano survey. After the intervention, the students improved their sun protection practices; fewer students went to the beach or swimming-pool at noon (9.8% vs 5.5%; p = 0.03), and more schoolchildren used cream with an SPF rating >15 (37.6% vs 76.2%; p <0.01) and repeatedly applied sunscreen if continuously exposed (67.4% vs 82.7%; p <0.01). Conclusion: Our findings show that the "Convive con el Sol" educational intervention improved photoprotection practices in children aged 3-8 years, but did not reduce the percentage of sunburned children. This pilot study serves as a starting point for designing educational interventions, targeting students, teachers, and families.


Students , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Educational Status , Pilot Projects , Schools
3.
J Cancer Educ ; 37(3): 819-828, 2022 06.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33025452

Sun exposure in childhood is a major risk factor for the development of skin cancer as an adult. School children spend much of their time outdoors exposed to ultraviolet radiation during recreational and sports activities. Skin cancer incidence tripled from 1978 to 2002 in Spain. Andalusia, the largest and sunniest region of Spain, lacks data on the sun protection measures taken in schools. To address this deficit, the aim of this study was to determine photoprotection practices and policies in preschools and primary schools in Andalusia. This descriptive study involved the administration of an online questionnaire completed by principals regarding school sun protection policies and practices. Preschool and primary schools were selected from the database of the Ministry of Education of the Andalusian Regional Government. Information of interest included photoprotection policies, students' sun protection knowledge, sun protection measures, relevant curricular content, and availability of shade at the school. A total of 2425 schools were contacted. Of them, 420 schools responded (17.31%), with the highest number of responses received from Malaga (23.8%) and Seville (19.5%) provinces. Of those responding, 67.1% of the schools did not have written sun protection policies. The photoprotection measures reported included mandatory use of a cap or hat (3.3%), use of sunglasses in outdoor areas (30%), and active encouragement of students to use sunscreen (50.7%). Roughly 24% of schools evaluated their shaded areas, with 52.9% reporting insufficient protection for most activities. The study results showed that photoprotection policies and practices in Andalusian schools were mostly insufficient. Given that skin cancer incidence has increased considerably over the last decade, it is important to concentrate on improving primary prevention practices. Additionally, photoprotection programs in schools have been shown to improve children's knowledge, attitudes, and habits regarding photoprotection. Thus, it is essential for Andalusian preschools and primary schools to develop policies and strategies to help reduce children's sun exposure while at school.


Skin Neoplasms , Sunburn , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Policy , Schools , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , Spain/epidemiology , Sunburn/prevention & control , Sunlight/adverse effects , Sunscreening Agents/therapeutic use , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects
4.
J Cancer Educ ; 37(1): 196-202, 2022 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32500453

Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), despite its low mortality, can impose a significant psychological burden on patients. The aim of the present study is to examine the evolution of the quality of life (QOL) in patients with cervicofacial NMSC during treatment. This prospective cohort study was conducted to a group of patients with cervicofacial NMSC, confirmed by skin biopsy. These patients completed the Skin Cancer Index questionnaire at the time of diagnosis and at 1 week, 1 month and 6 months after treatment began. Data for these patients' demographic characteristics and variables related to the type of tumour, the treatment received and the evolution of the condition were recorded. The study group was composed of 220 patients. At the time of diagnosis, the overall mean score for QOL was 54.1 (SD 21.9); for the social appearance component, it was 76.7 (SD 26.2), and for the emotional component, it was 23 (SD 25.1). Six months after treatment began, the overall mean score was 61 (SD19.1), that for social appearance, 85 (SD 20.6), and that for the emotional component, 27.4 (SD 26.6). All the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The results obtained show that during the treatment period, it is at the time of diagnosis when patients with cervicofacial NMSC undergo the greatest deterioration in their QOL. In comparison with the findings obtained in previous studies, our population obtained lower overall scores in the questionnaires and less improvement during follow-up.


Carcinoma, Basal Cell , Quality of Life , Skin Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/psychology , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/therapy , Humans , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life/psychology , Skin Neoplasms/psychology , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Social Interaction
5.
Saf Health Work ; 12(2): 244-248, 2021 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34178403

BACKGROUND: Sunburn is the main avoidable cause of skin cancer. Beach lifeguards spend many hours exposed to the effects of solar radiation during their work day, precisely at times of the year when levels of solar irradiation are highest. The aim of this study is to quantify the risk to beach lifeguards of sun exposure. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in the Western Costa del Sol, southern Spain, during the summer of 2018. The research subjects were recruited during a skin cancer prevention course for beach lifeguards. All participants were invited to complete a questionnaire on their habits, attitudes, and knowledge related to sun exposure. In addition, ten were specially monitored using personal dosimeters for three consecutive days, and the results were recorded in a photoprotection diary. A descriptive analysis (mean and standard deviation for the quantitative variables) was performed, and inter-group differences were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Two hundred fifteen lifeguards completed the questionnaire, and 109 met the criteria for inclusion in this analysis. The mean age was 23.8 years (SD: 5.1), 78.0% were male, 71.5% were phototype III or IV (Fitzpatrick's phototype), and 77.1% had experienced at least one painful sunburn during the previous summer. The mean daily personal ultraviolet exposure per day, the minimal erythema dose, and the standard erythema dose, in J/m2, were 634.7 [standard deviation (SD): 356.2], 2.5 (SD: 1.4) and 6.35 (SD: 3.6), respectively. CONCLUSION: Beach lifeguards receive very high doses of solar radiation during the work day and experience correspondingly high rates of sunburn. Intervention strategies to modify their sun exposure behavior and working environment are necessary to reduce the risk of skin cancer for these workers and to promote early diagnosis of the disease.

7.
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat ; 29(4): 184-190, 2021 Nov.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36896688

Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most common neoplasm. The characteristics of this disease (location in aesthetically sensitive areas, the appearance of successive tumors during follow-up, and high rates of survival) are such that the concept of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is of particular importance. The aim of the present study was to describe and analyses patient quality of life following diagnosis with cervicofacial NMSC. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with cervicofacial NMSC, confirmed by skin biopsy. In each case, when the definitive diagnosis of NMSC was established, the patient completed the Skin Cancer Index questionnaire and demographic data, health status, and sun exposure habits were recorded. The study population was composed of 220 patients with histologically confirmed cervicofacial NMSC. The mean score obtained for the Skin Cancer Index questionnaire was 54.1 (SD 21.9), in which the social-aesthetic component had a mean score of 76.7 (SD 26.2), while the emotional component had a mean score of 23 (SD 25.1). Male patients, those with secondary or higher education, and those who had no history of anxiety or depression had significantly higher mean scores for HRQoL. This study demonstrated that the diagnosis of cervicofacial NMSC significantly impacts HRQoL and that certain population groups (women, persons with only primary or no education qualifications, and those a history of anxiety or depression) are more susceptible. The questionnaire scores obtained were lower than those reported in previous studies on this topic and reflect a particularly strong impact on emotional aspects of patient quality of life.


Quality of Life , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Female , Quality of Life/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Anxiety/etiology
14.
Dermatol Ther ; 31(4): e12615, 2018 Jul.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29740900

Most studies of oral oxybutynin (OOx) for the treatment of hyperhidrosis (HH) have assumed a stable treatment protocol, without taking into account adverse effects (AE) or seasonal variations in temperature. The objective is to evaluate adjusting the dose of OOx according to the time of year. Prospective study of patients who began OOx for HH between 2007 and 2017, and maintained treatment for at least 1 year, with a progressively increasing dose was performed. All patients were recommended to vary the dose of medication according to the time of year. Baseline epidemiological data, the response to treatment and AE were analyzed. About 122 patients were included (average age of 33.8 years). Up to 60.7% varied the dose. Significantly better results were obtained in the group that varied the dose. Twenty patients suspended the treatment in winter. Among them the adjusted OR was 3.04 (95% CI 1.24-7.45) for an excellent response. The frequency of AE was 74.6% with no differences among groups. Most patients are able to control their HH without requiring the same dose of OOx throughout the year. Given that the possible AE of OOx are dose-dependent, it seems reasonable to vary it according to the time of year.


Hyperhidrosis/drug therapy , Mandelic Acids/administration & dosage , Muscarinic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Seasons , Sweating/drug effects , Administration, Oral , Adult , Drug Dosage Calculations , Female , Humans , Hyperhidrosis/diagnosis , Hyperhidrosis/physiopathology , Male , Mandelic Acids/adverse effects , Muscarinic Antagonists/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
...